![]() XnView is just fast, and with nearly all commands having a keyboard shortcut, there is no fuss.īy far, the standout feature for me is the batch processing: virtually any of the processing features in XnView can be set to run across groups of files (for example, resizing, adding watermarks, or producing overlay text. For example, when I produce an Fstoppers article, I need a banner image that’s 1000 x 570 pixels. It’s a quick resize to 1000 pixels wide, then a custom selection that is set to 570 pixels high. For my post-production work, this covers pretty much everything I need to do. It is also an image-level editor, allowing easy resize, rotate and crop (including lossless JPEG), simple adjustments (brightness, contrast, levels, color depth), and filter effects (such as blur, sharpen, noise reduction). XnView does this with aplomb, supporting over 500 file formats (usefully including multipage TIFFs) and allowing thumbnails, film strips or slideshows, as well as producing contact sheets. I usually export my images as JPEG/TIFF for clients and print houses once processing is complete, so after that, I need something quick to browse directories of images, review metadata, crop, rotate, batch rename/resize, print contact sheets, and apply quick grayscaling or levels adjustments. So, is this really that useful? I do all my DAM in Lightroom and when I want more selective, layer-based edits, I move to Affinity. It doesn't do DAM (digital asset management) or pixel-level editing. Before I go any further, let me clarify what it doesn't do. It supports a vast array of file formats, allows simple image level manipulations, and has a powerful batch-processing engine. ![]() And my vote goes to XnView, an application built from the ground up to view images quickly - very quickly. So when it comes to image viewers, I'm after something that allows me to eyeball photos quickly, supports masses of file formats, has flexible batch-processing, and launches fast. " Simplicity is good, because it strips back to what you need to achieve a task, and in the software world, that often means speed. And on that score, Lightroom and Photoshop may just top the mark for overcomplicated bloatware. I'm not knocking their capabilities for which they are exemplary and market-leading, but if there is a software mantra I like to stick to, then it is "keep it simple. We’re plumping for XnView.Sometimes, I like to keep things simple. So, when it comes to choose between FastStone Image Viewer or XnView, think about what your main needs are (do you fancy a colourful interface? do you usually review your photos in full screen? do you work with a lot of different formats? do you need many editing tools?) and just act accordingly. However, XnView beats FastStone in the number of supported formats –more than 400, against the roughly 20 opened by its competitor. They also share extra features like the ability to set any photo as wallpaper, a screen capturing tool and a red-eye removal tool, just to mention a few. On the other side, FastStone offers a better performance when working in full screen mode, as it features a series of very handy menu bars to access editing tools, see EXIF data or navigate through the photo stream.īoth applications include a basic set of tools to edit your pictures (such as crop, resize, rotate, flip, etc.) and an advanced toolkit for further editing, which is more complete in XnView. On the one side, XnView allows you to open more than one picture at the same time thanks to its tabbed interface. Both programs use thumbnails to display photos and ALT text windows to show detailed information about each picture.īeing image viewers, both FastStone and XnView focus their main function into displaying photos in a comfortable way. Whilst XnView looks very much like Windows Explorer, with a tree-like structure on the left and the selected folder’s contents on the right, FastStone Image Viewer uses a neatly designed interface that you can customize with skins. ![]() When launching both programs, the first noticeable difference is their interface. Two of the most powerful candidates are FastStone Image Viewer and XnView, two popular image viewers that share many features but also have certain differences. Apart from Picasa‘s indisputable first position among image viewers, there’s a very interesting competition in the Top Downloads list for this category on Softonic.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |